Educational publication only. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. No fiduciary relationship. Hypothetical / paper results do not indicate future performance. Full disclaimer

This classroom is an educational publication, not advice. Study tools, labs, and paper results stay hypothetical. Read the disclaimer.

Glossary term

Correlation

Definition

How two series tend to move together. Near 1 they travel as one. Near 0 they wander separately. In stress, many correlations rise — the grid goes one color.

How it works

Correlation measures how two return series tend to move together, on a scale from −1 to +1. The usual formula divides the covariance of the two series by the product of their standard deviations: ρ = cov(x, y) / (σx × σy). Near +1 the pair moves almost as one, near 0 their moves are unrelated, and near −1 they tend to move opposite ways.

It is a sample statistic: a number computed from whatever window of history was available, not a fixed fact about the world. Most history is calm, so the figure mostly describes ordinary weeks. In stress a single shared driver, such as forced selling or a repricing of risk, can dominate everything at once, and correlations that looked comfortable can rise together.

Worked example

Take a hypothetical two-asset book, 50% in each, with both assets at 20% annual volatility. Portfolio volatility is 20% × √(0.5² + 0.5² + 2 × 0.5 × 0.5 × ρ), which simplifies to 20% × √(0.5 + 0.5ρ).

At ρ = 0 that is 14.14%. At ρ = 0.5 it is 17.32%. At ρ = 0.95 it is 19.75%, and at ρ = 1 it is the full 20%. Nothing about either asset changed between those lines. Only the relationship moved, and nearly all of the benefit of combining them was lost.

Hypothetical, for education only. Not a recommendation and not a prediction.

Common mistake

The mistake is quoting a correlation measured in calm conditions as though it were a property of the pair. A coefficient of 0.35 over three quiet years can be accurate and still say almost nothing about the week the protection was wanted. A correlation should be quoted with its window, and the practical habit is to try to name the mechanism that makes it true. If you cannot, you are relying on a pattern.

Where the course uses it